ADQ for Airports

Report
ADQ for Airports
Torunn I. Carlsson
Director Technical and Aeronautical Information Management
Avinor
ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP
28-29 May 2013
Avinor’s Airports
•
•
•
•
46 airports
5 mill people
22 mill pax
~10000 Pax
Status Airports dataorigination
• All airports regularly survey (every ~2-5 year)
(Arial photography, laserscanning)
• AMDB for all airports
– 36 airports with 3D AMDB / 10 airports 2D
• Critical «points» (THR, Instr etc.) survey
– Landsurveying company – full digital transfer
• For all data submitted to AIP: metadata and
sourcedata recorded in originatordatabase
• GIS used at airports for operations – data
maintenance
Challenges
• Lack of understanding of why ADQ?
• Common message from the regulators in each
state?
• Are the rules and guidelines clear enough?
• Cost
• Lack of priority
– New EASA rules for certification
– CDM
– Other projects
Airport data / AMDB
• Consistency between the regulations
• How do I as an airport report changes ?
• Can the datamodell I use be used for reporting
to AISP?
• Who has to save the data for historical
purposes?
• Do I have to make my AMDB temporal?
• CAD world
SLA
• SLA between airport and AISP required?
– Cost?
• ADQ data originator Harmonized list vs
EASA NPA ?
• Are they the same? Which one do I follow?
Obstacles
Area
Hor. acc
Ver. acc
2a
5m
3m
2b
5m
3m
2c
5m
3m
2d
5m
3m
3
.5 m
.5 m
4
2.5 m
1m
• Cost of obstacle surveying?
• Who is paying?
Terrain
Terrain data
Hor.acc
Ver.acc
Area 1
50 m
30 m
Area 2
5m
3m
Area 3
.5 m
.5 m
Area 4
2.5 m
1m
Terrain data collection :
National Mapping authority?
National civil aviation authority?
ANSP?
Airport?
WHY WORRY?
Example of obstacle surfaces around
Norwegian airport

similar documents