Presidential Policy Directive PPD/8 National Preparedness

Report
Hispanic Association of Colleges
and Universities
Washington, DC
March 26, 2012
1
Discussion Points








PPD-8 – National Preparedness
FY 2012 – A Year of Transition
Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative
FY 2013 – What’s Next
State Administrative Agent
How Can Grant Funding Be Utilized
What Colleges and Universities Need to Do
Resources
PPD-8 National Preparedness
 Aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the U.S. through “systematic
preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation”
 An evolutionary step from current HSPD-8 methods
 Signed March 30, 2011; replaces HSPD-8 and Annex 1
 PPD Implementation Plan delivered on May 27, 2011; approved by the President for
release on July 8, 2011
 A Linking together of the national efforts, organized around key elements
 the ends we wish to achieve (the National Preparedness Goal – Completed)
 the means to achieve it (the National Preparedness System – Completed)
 the delivery; how we use what we build (National Frameworks – Due
6/30/2012; Federal Interagency Operational Plans – Due 9/25/2012)
 the reporting of our progress (Annual National Preparedness Report – Due
3/30/2012 and annually thereafter)
 the sustained engagement (Build and Sustain Preparedness - Ongoing)
3
PPD-8 Key Principles
 Employ an all-of-Nation/whole community approach, integrating efforts
across federal, state, local, tribal and territorial governments and with
private sector, community, non-governmental, and individual partners
 Use a risk-based approach to support preparedness
 Build core capabilities to confront any challenge
 Integrate efforts across Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response,
and Recovery
 Assess performance outcomes to measure and track progress
4
The National Preparedness Goal
A secure and resilient Nation with the capabilities
required across the whole community to prevent,
protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover
from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest
risk.
Defined by the capability target measures of the core
capabilities within the mission areas of prevent, protect,
mitigate, respond, and recover
5
National Preparedness Goal
Supporting Components
 Core capabilities:
 Distinct highly interdependent elements necessary for our success
 Capability targets:
 Performance threshold(s) for each core capability that will guide our allocation of resources
to support national preparedness
 Emphasis on whole community:
 Whole community includes all members of society, including individuals, communities, the
private and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, and Federal, state, local, tribal, and
territorial governments
 The Goal seeks to enable the whole community to contribute to and benefit from national
preparedness
 Strategic National Risk Assessment:
 In accordance with PPD-8, a Strategic National Risk Assessment was conducted
 The SNRA identified a wide range of threats and hazards that pose a significant risk to the
nation, affirming the need for an all-hazards, capability-based approach to preparedness
planning
6
Core Capabilities List
PREVENT
PROTECT
MITIGATE
RESPOND
RECOVER
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Public Information and
Warning
Public Information and
Warning
Public Information and
Warning
Public Information and
Warning
Public Information and
Warning
Operational
Coordination
Operational
Coordination
Operational
Coordination
Operational
Coordination
Operational
Coordination
Forensics and
Attribution
Access Control and
Identity Verification
Community Resilience
Critical Transportation
Economic Recovery
Intelligence and
Information Sharing
Cybersecurity
Long-Term Vulnerability
Reduction
Environmental Response
/ Health and Safety
Health and Social
Services
Interdiction and
Disruption
Intelligence and
Information Sharing
Risk and Disaster
Resilience Assessment
Fatality Management
Services
Housing
Screening, Search and
Detection
Interdiction and
Disruption
Threats and Hazard
Identification
Infrastructure Systems
Infrastructure Systems
Mass Care Services
Natural and Cultural
Resources
Physical Protective
Measures
Risk Management for
Protection Programs
and Activities
Screening, Search and
Detection
Supply Chain Integrity
and Security
Mass Search and Rescue
Operations
On-Scene Security and
Protection
Operational
Communications
Public and Private
Services and Resources
Public Health and
Medical Services
Situational Assessment
7
National Preparedness System
Description Components
 The National Preparedness System (NPS)
description is comprised of six major
components
 Identifying and Assessing Risk
 Estimating Capability Requirements
 Building and Sustaining Capabilities
 Planning to Deliver Capabilities
 Validating Capabilities
 Reviewing and Updating
8
Build and Sustain Preparedness
 Comprised of four key elements…
 A comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness, to
include public outreach and community-based and private-sector programs to
enhance national resilience
 Federal preparedness
 Federal preparedness assistance (i.e., grants and technical assistance)
 National research and development efforts
 Activities for the effort to Build and Sustain Preparedness will begin shortly
3 mo
6 mo
9 mo
1 yr
15 mo
18 mo
21 mo
2 yrs
PPD-8 Signed
March 30, 2011
Ongoing
9
FY 2012 - Year of Transition
 PL 112-74 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012
For grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities,
$1,349,681,000, which shall be distributed, according to threat,
vulnerability, and consequence, at the discretion of the Secretary of
Homeland Security
 $675 M for Fire Fighter Assistance Grants (AFG & SAFER)
 $350 M for Emergency Management Performance Grants
10
FY11 & FY12
Funding Summary
Program
Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI)
Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG)
State Homeland Security Program (SHSP)
Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)
Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)
Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak)
Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP)
UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS)
Citizen Corps Program (CCP)
Driver’s License Security Grant Program (DLSGP)
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant Program
Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program
(RCPGP)
Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP)
Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP)
Total
FY 2011
$662,622,100
$329,040,400
$526,874,100
$235,029,000
$200,079,000
$54,890,000
$22,214,456
$10,000,000
$18,962,000
$34,929,932
$9,980,000
$45,188,000
$14,601,740
FY 2012
$490,376,000
$339,500,000
$294,000,000
$97,500,000
$87,500,000
$46,600,000
$10,000,000
$6,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,101,736
$0
$7,745,544
$4,990,000
$2,191,248,008
For Internal Use Only
Delta ($)
Delta (%)
($172,246,100)
-26%
$10,459,600
3%
($232,874,100)
-44%
($137,529,000)
-59%
($112,579,000)
-56%
($8,290,000)
-15%
($12,214,456)
-55%
($4,000,000)
-40%
($8,962,000)
-47%
($34,929,932) -100%
($9,980,000) -100%
($45,188,000) -100%
($14,601,740) -100%
($14,101,736)
-100%
$0
($7,745,544) -100%
$0
($4,990,000) -100%
$1,381,476,000 ($809,772,008) -36.95%
11
FY 2012 – What’s New
 Alignment to National Preparedness Goal
 Program by Mission Area
 Core Capabilities supported by program
 Program Priorities
 Sustainment of core capabilities at state/territory/regional/local/tribal level that
can be considered national assets and deployable via intra and inter state
mutual aid
 Emphasis on sustainment lifecycle (updated plans, refresher training and
exercises, equipment maintenance and updates)
12
FY 2012 – What’s New
Program Priorities – Cont’d
 Mutual Aid agreements and EMAC membership (for states and territories) a
requirement
 Building out new capabilities only when other core capabilities have been
sustained
 Risk assessments drive prioritization of new capabilities
 FY 2011 performance measures carried into FY 2012
 24 month period of performance
13
Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative
 $8.3 Billion in unexpended grant funds from FY 2007 to FY 2011
 Secretary’s Guidance to SAAs issued on February 13
 Info Bulletin #379 issued by FEMA on February 17 implementing
Secretary’s Guidance
 Expanded allowability to maximum permitted by 9/11 Act
 Streamlined waiver process
 Stricter period of performance extension criteria
14
FY 2013 – What’s Coming
 FY 2013 Budget includes $2.9 billion in grant funding
 Consolidates 16 other grants into the new, streamlined National
Preparedness Grant Program (NPGP)
 Competitive, risk-based model
 Funding allocations based on prioritized core capabilities as well as
comprehensive threat/risk assessments and gap analyses
 Each state and territory will receive a base level of funding allocated in
accordance with a population driven formula
15
FY 2013 – What’s Coming
 Remainder of grant allocations determined competitively, based on
criticality of specific capability according to regional threat/risk assessments
and applicant’s ability to complete the project within two year period of
performance
 NPGP will focus on:
developing and sustaining core capabilities
enhancing terrorism prevention and protection capabilities
critical infrastructure/ key resource protection
16
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
AGENCY (SAA)
Each State and territory has a governor appointed contact responsible for
managing all GPD funds and associated program requirements
The SAA should be the main point of contact as they are the initial
recipient of most grant awards
Colleges and Universities apply directly to FEMA for Fire Prevention
and Safety Grants
17
ALLOWABLE FUNDING
CATEGORIES
 Planning
 Training
 Exercises
 Equipment
 Organization – including personnel costs
 Management and Administration
 Construction – in selected programs
18
ALLOWABLE EQUIPMENT
CATEGORIES
 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)  CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment
 Detection Equipment
 Decontamination Equipment
 Interoperable Communications
Equipment
 CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles/
Aircraft/Watercraft
 CBRNE Search & Rescue Equipment
 CBRNE Reference Materials
 Terrorism Incident Prevention
Equipment
 Agricultural Terrorism Prevention, Response
& Mitigation
 Explosive Device Mitigation and
Remediation Equipment
 Cyber Security
 Physical Security Enhancement
Equipment
 Citizen Corps specific equipment
 Intervention Equipment
 Medical Supplies/Pharmaceuticals
19
WHAT COLLEGES/UNIVERSITIES
NEED TO DO
•Develop relationship with SAA, State EMA or UASI
•Read program guidance and application kits for grant programs at
www.fema.gov/grants and http://www.firegrantsupport.com/ to become
familiar with program eligibility, program requirements and allowable
expenditures
•Determine your needs or capabilities in relation to the various grant
programs
20
AVAILABLE RESOURCES
Centralized Scheduling & Information Desk (CSID) Help Line
800.368.6498 or [email protected]
Monday – Friday: 8 am – 6 pm (EST)
Grant Programs Directorate
FEMA Call Center: 866.927.5646 or [email protected]
FEMA Grants Web Page
www.fema.gov/grants
FEMA AFG Web Page
www.fema.gov/firegrants/
Responder Knowledge Base – Authorized Equipment List
www.rkb.us
21
Contact Information
C. Gary Rogers
Senior Policy Advisor
Grant Programs Directorate
DHS/FEMA
[email protected]
202-786-9769
22
2
23

similar documents