Report

Overview of Academic Achievement Distinction Designations AADDC: Science and Social Studies | March 7, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Rating Labels 2 Accountability Rating (Campuses and Districts) Met Standard Met Alternative Standard* (assigned to charter operators and alternative education campuses (AECs) evaluated under alternative education accountability (AEA) provisions) Improvement Required *AECs evaluated under AEA provisions are not eligible for distinction designations, per Texas Education Code (TEC) §39.201. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Distinction Designations 3 Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following distinction designations. 2014 2013 Academic Achievement in: Academic Achievement in: Reading/English Language Arts (ELA) Reading/ELA Mathematics Mathematics Science Social Studies Index 2: Student Progress – Top 25% Index 2: Student Progress – Top 25% Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness for campuses and districts Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Academic Achievement Distinction Designation 4 2013 Academic Achievement - Reading/ELA and mathematics Campuses with grades 3-12 enrollment that achieve a Met Standard rating are eligible to receive academic achievement distinction designation (AADD). Campuses are evaluated solely on the “All Students” student group. Elementary and middle schools in the top quartile on at least 50 percent of the above indicators receive a distinction designation for that subject area. High schools in the top quartile on at least 33 percent of the above indicators receive a distinction designation for that subject area. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting 2013 AADD Indicators by Campus Type and Subject AADD Indicator 5 Attendance rate Greater Than Expected Student Growth Grade 3 Reading Performance (Level III) Grade 4 Writing Performance (Level III) Grade 5 Math Performance (Level III) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Level III) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8-Participation Algebra I by Grade 8–Performance (Level III) AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: Math SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: ELA SAT Performance: Math ACT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: Math Reading/ELA Total Indicators Mathematics High School Middle Junior Elementary K-8 K-12 School High Not Subject Specific / Applies to both subjects and all levels ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA & Math R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA Math Math Math Math Math R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA R/ELA Math Math Math Math Math Math Math Math ELA & Math ELA & Math R/ELA Math ELA & Math R/ELA Math R/ELA Math 7 7 R/ELA Math ELA & Math R/ELA Math R/ELA Math 11 10 4 5 4 5 4 3 R/ELA = indicator can be evaluated for Reading/English Language Arts only Math = indicator can be evaluated for Mathematics only ELA & Math= indicator will be evaluated for both Reading/ELA and Mathematics Not Subject Specific = indicator cannot be directly associated with either Reading/ELA or Mathematics Blank = indicator is not applicable at this campus level. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting 6 5 Methodology for AADD 6 Mathematics Example Compare performance on each indicator to campuses in Comparison Groups Generate a single outcome for campus by subject Identify campuses that qualify to earn Distinction Designations Mathematics ACT Performance Mathematics AP/IB Performance Top Quartile Top Quartile among among comparison comparison group group Campus Outcome for Subject: Percent of Measures in the Top Quartile … … (2 out of 4 = 50%, 3 out of 5 = 60%, or 3 out of 8= 38%) Statewide Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: Eligible Distinctions based on the Percent of Measures in the Top Quartile Elementary and Middle Schools: 50% or higher High Schools and K-12 campuses: 33% or higher Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Up to 11 indicators (depending on campus grade configuration) Top Quartile among comparison group Distinction Designation Step 2 Top Quartile among comparison group Step 3 Algebra I by end of Grade 8 Step 4 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Campus Profile Report Step 1 Determine Campus Comparison Group Methodology for AADD – Step 1 7 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS 1. Identify a campus comparison group for Pflugerville High School based on: a. Campus type (elementary, middle, high school); b. Campus size (total student enrollment); c. Percent of economically disadvantaged students enrolled for 2012-13; d. Percent of limited English proficient students enrolled for 2012-13; and e. Percent of mobile students, as determined from 2011-12 cumulative attendance. Resource: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/srch.html?srch=C Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting District Name PFLUGERVILLE H S (227904001) PFLUGERVILLE ISD Number of Students % Econ Disadv Mobility Rate 6.1 42.6 11.2 1 ALVIN H S (020901001) ALVIN ISD 2,400 2.4 48.6 15.2 2 3 4 5 6 MANVEL H S (020901002) AUSTIN H S (227901002) WEST BROOK SR H S (123910008) BELTON H S (014903001) BIRDVILLE H S (220902010) ALVIN ISD AUSTIN ISD BEAUMONT ISD BELTON ISD BIRDVILLE ISD 2,313 2,151 2,306 2,540 2,007 2.2 3.2 2.3 3.5 5.4 40.9 34.6 45.6 39.7 35.0 13.8 13.1 15.3 16.0 12.7 7 8 9 10 11 RICHLAND H S (220902002) BRAZOSWOOD H S (020905002) CREEKVIEW H S (057903006) COPPERAS COVE H S (050910001) DENTON H S (061901003) BIRDVILLE ISD BRAZOSPORT ISD CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD COPPERAS COVE ISD DENTON ISD 2,187 2,428 1,981 2,172 1,985 3.8 1.6 5.9 0.6 9.2 37.5 37.9 44.7 38.5 43.0 12.1 14.7 12.1 15.3 17.5 12 13 14 15 16 RYAN H S (061901002) SAGINAW H S (220918004) CORONADO H S (071902005) HIGHTOWER H S (079907008) KEMPNER H S (079907005) DENTON ISD EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD EL PASO ISD FORT BEND ISD FORT BEND ISD 2,284 1,980 2,660 2,271 2,308 11.0 3.4 7.5 3.6 5.1 47.5 38.9 39.9 47.8 37.0 14.7 16.4 13.6 11.7 8.8 17 18 19 20 21 PASCHAL H S (220905010) NAAMAN FOREST H S (057909008) SACHSE H S (057909010) LEHMAN H S (105906005) SUMMER CREEK H S (101913014) FORT WORTH ISD GARLAND ISD GARLAND ISD HAYS CISD HUMBLE ISD 2,720 2,424 2,716 2,137 2,182 3.5 4.4 4.1 6.1 4.2 47.6 48.8 37.0 51.6 46.9 10.9 12.0 12.2 15.8 16.5 22 23 24 25 26 BELL H S (220916001) TRINITY H S (220916002) FOSSIL RIDGE H S (220907002) LA PORTE HIGH SCHOOL (101916001) THE COLONY H S (061902004) HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD KELLER ISD LA PORTE ISD LEWISVILLE ISD 2,076 2,404 2,127 2,165 1,955 3.9 3.8 4.6 2.1 3.9 41.5 46.0 36.9 40.1 36.0 14.1 14.9 12.6 13.3 11.8 27 28 29 30 31 LONGVIEW H S (092903001) LUBBOCK H S (152901022) MANSFIELD SUMMIT H S (220908002) MEMORIAL H S (108906002) HORN H S (057914005) LONGVIEW ISD LUBBOCK ISD MANSFIELD ISD MCALLEN ISD MESQUITE ISD 1,975 2,118 2,055 2,262 2,190 2.1 2.2 5.3 13.3 2.5 49.8 49.6 50.6 43.1 42.4 15.0 16.6 16.3 16.2 12.7 32 33 34 35 36 MACARTHUR H S (015910002) BRENNAN H S (015915024) TAFT H S (015915007) HENDRICKSON H S (227904004) BERKNER H S (057916005) NORTH EAST ISD NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE ISD PFLUGERVILLE ISD RICHARDSON ISD 2,640 2,079 2,618 2,401 2,572 2.9 1.3 1.9 6.2 6.5 40.5 36.3 45.1 36.2 49.6 15.8 13.1 15.9 11.6 16.3 37 38 39 40 RICHARDSON H S (057916003) STONY POINT H S (246909007) ROBERT E LEE H S (212905001) WAXAHACHIE H S (070912002) RICHARDSON ISD ROUND ROCK ISD TYLER ISD WAXAHACHIE ISD 2,592 2,280 2,666 1,836 4.9 4.7 3.5 1.6 48.7 42.8 46.3 44.3 12.1 16.4 16.0 15.3 2,279 4.3 42.9 14.2 Comparison Group Average 2,265 % ELL 2013 Campus Comparison Group PFLUGERVILLE H S (227904001) - PFLUGERVILLE ISD Campus Type: High School Sorted by District Name 8 Campus Name Methodology for AADD – Step 2 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Step 2 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile 96.1% Q1 2% Q3 Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) Compare AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation performance on AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics each indicator SAT/ACT Participation to campuses in SAT Performance: Mathematics Comparison ACT Performance: Mathematics Group 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 Campus Profile Report Step 1 9 Blank values for an Indicator Score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a Quartile occur if there are less than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The Attendance Rate Indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to both Reading/ELA and Mathematics. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Methodology for AADD – Step 3 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Step 2 Step 3 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile 96.1% Q1 2% Q3 Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) Compare AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation performance on AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics each indicator SAT/ACT Participation to campuses in SAT Performance: Mathematics Comparison ACT Performance: Mathematics Group Total Indicators for Mathematics Generate a single outcome for campus by subject 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: 2 of 7 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Q1 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 2 of 7 2 of 7 = 29% Campus Profile Report Step 1 10 Methodology for AADD – Step 4 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Step 2 Step 3 Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile 96.1% Q1 2% Q3 Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) Compare AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation performance on AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics each indicator SAT/ACT Participation to campuses in SAT Performance: Mathematics Comparison ACT Performance: Mathematics Group Total Indicators for Mathematics Generate a single outcome for campus by subject Identify campuses that qualify to earn Distinction Designations 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: 2 of 7 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) Distinction Target: High School = 33% or higher NO DISTINCTION EARNED Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Q1 Q2 Q2 Q2 Q2 2 of 7 2 of 7 = 29% Distinction Designation Step 4 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Campus Profile Report Step 1 11 2013 Statewide Summary 12 Campuses Earning Distinction Designations by Campus Type School Type Distinction 2013 Total Multi Count Elem Middle HS Reading/ELA 547 183 63 28 821 9.6% Reading/ELA & Mathematics 164 81 147 32 424 5.0% Mathematics 133 122 84 24 363 4.2% Top 25% Progress 326 94 117 16 553 6.5% Top 25% Progress & Reading/ELA 186 88 34 11 319 3.7% Top 25% Progress & Math 208 93 48 11 360 4.2% Top 25% Progress, Reading/ELA & Math 385 182 152 40 759 8.9% Not Eligible 2,663 863 1,102 328 4,956 57.9% Totals 4,612 1,706 1,747 490 8,555 100.0% Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Percent Resources 13 2014 Accountability Development http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html 2013 Accountability Rating System http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html Performance Reporting Home Page http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport Performance Reporting E-mail [email protected] Division of Performance Reporting Telephone (512) 463-9704 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting