Using CAS Standards and Review Process for Improving Student

Report
A Connoisseur, a Critic, and a
Skeptic walk into a student union…
CAS provides a structured method of evaluation:
 Is the “X” functioning effectively to achieve its
mission?
 X can equal program, service, department
 What evidence is available to support the
determination?
What is CAS?
The mission of the Council for the
Advancement of Standards in Higher Education
(CAS) is to promote the improvement of
programs and services to enhance the quality of
student learning and development.
CAS is a consortium of professional
associations who work collaboratively to develop
and promulgate standards and guidelines and to
encourage self-assessment.
Essential Elements
in the CAS Approach




Culture that values involvement of all its members
Has identified quality indicators
Use of standards and guidelines
Willingness/capacity:
 To examine itself and assemble results
 To report and use the results
 Credibility, accountability, improvement:
 Program & service improvement; measures of quality and
effectiveness; measures of impact on learning
Purpose
 Introduce the CAS Standards
 Develop capacity to conduct CAS self-review
 Recognize value of Program & Learning Outcomes
 Provide support and motivation as you continue to
progress toward becoming…
Able to
demonstrate
contributions to
student learning
Assessment Pyramid
SL
CAS
Accreditation
CAS Self-Assessment Process
Establish and prepare the Self-Assessment Teams
Compile and evaluate evidence
Determine how well Standards are met
Where needed, determine appropriate corrective
action
5. Recommend steps for program enhancement
6. Prepare an action plan
1.
2.
3.
4.
The Self-Assessment Team
Appoint and Train the Team:
 Size of team ≈ 5
 Composition: Faculty, Staff, Students & Others
 Leader & admin. support
 Establish team ground rules
 Discuss meaning of each standard
 Establish team’s inter-rater reliability
 Encourage team discussion; expect disagreements;
commit to consensual resolution
Team Actions
 Decide whether to include guidelines or other
measures that go beyond the standards
 Gather and analyze quantitative and qualitative
data
 Individuals rate each and every criterion measure
 Obtain additional documentary evidence if
required to make an informed team decision
 Complete the assessment, ratings & action plan
worksheets
Organization of CAS Standards








Mission
Program
Leadership
Human Resources
Ethics
Legal Responsibilities
Equity and Access
Diversity
 Organization and





Management
Campus and External
Relations
Financial Resources
Technology
Facilities and Equipment
Assessment and
Evaluation
CAS: Standards and Guidelines
STANDARD (BOLD TYPE; AUXILARY VERB MUST)
Financial Aid Programs (FAP) must have adequate, suitably located
facilities and equipment to support its mission and goals efficiently
and effectively. Facilities and equipment must be evaluated regularly
and be in compliance with relevant federal, state, provincial, and
local requirements to provide for access, health, safety, and security.
GUIDELINE (LIGHT-FACED TYPE; VERB SHOULD)
The program should have facilities or have access to:
 private office or space for confidential counseling, interviewing, and
other meetings
 office, reception, and storage space and security sufficient to
accommodate assigned staff, supplies, equipment, library resources,
and machinery
 conference room or meeting space
Assessment Criteria Example
Part 6: FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Financial Aid Programs (FAP) must have adequate funding to accomplish its mission and goals. Funding
priorities must be determined within the context of the stated mission, goals, objectives, and
comprehensive analysis of the needs and capabilities of students and the availability of internal or
external resources.
FAP must demonstrate fiscal responsibility and cost effectiveness consistent with institutional protocols.
PART 6. FINANCIAL RESOURCES (Criterion Measures)
Rating Scale
6.1 The program has adequate funding to accomplish its mission and goals.
ND 1 2 3 4 NR
6.2 Funding priorities are determined within the context of program mission,
student needs, and available fiscal resources.
ND 1 2 3 4 NR
6.3 The program demonstrates fiscal responsibility and cost effectiveness
consistent with institutional protocols.
ND 1 2 3 4 NR
Part 6: Financial Resources Overview Questions
A. What is the funding strategy for the program?
B. What evidence exists to confirm fiscal responsibility and cost-effectiveness?
NOTES
Criterion Measure Rating Scale
ND
Not Done
1
Not met
2
3
4
NR
Minimally
Met
Well
Met
Fully
Met
Not Rated
Using this scale, consider the evidence available
and decide the extent to which each criterion
measure has been met.
CAS: Work Form A
Assessment, Ratings, and Significant Items
CAS
Work Form A
Assessment, Ratings, and Significant Items
INSTRUCTIONS:
This work form should be completed following individual ratings of the participants. For each of the 13 Parts, identify (circle) the criterion
measure item number(s) in the column labeled for which there is a substantial rating discrepancy (two or more ratings apart). Items not circled
should reflect consensus among judges that practice in that area is satisfactory. Items where judgment variance occurs need to be discussed
thoroughly by team members. Follow this action by determining which practices (criterion measures) can be designated as “excellent” or
“unsatisfactory” and record them in the Step One column. In Step Two, list the items requiring follow-up action including any criterion measure
rated as being unsatisfactory by any reviewer.
Step One
Part
Items
Excellent
1. Mission
1.1a
1.4
1.1b
1.5
1.1c
1.6
1.2
1.3
2. Program
2.1
2.4.3
2.4.8
2.4.1
3
2.6
2.8d
2.11
2.2
2.4.4
2.4.9
2.4.1
4
2.7
2.8e
2.12
2.3
2.4.5
2.4.1
0
2.4.1
5
2.8a
2.8f
2.13
2.4.1
2.4.6
2.4.1
1
2.4.1
6
2.8b
2.9
2.4.2
2.4.7
2.4.1
2
2.5
2.8c
2.10
Unsatisfactory
CAS: Work Form A continued
Step Two: List item number(s) for each Part determined to merit
follow-up and describe the practice weaknesses that require attention
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CAS Work Form B:
Follow Up Actions
INSTRUCTIONS:
The purpose of this work form is to begin the planning for action to be
taken on the practices judged to merit follow-up (See Step 1, Work Form A).
In Step Three, transfer short descriptions of the practices requiring followup and detail these items using the table format provided.
Step Three: Describe the current practice that requires change and actions to
initiate the change
Practice
Description
Corrective Action
Sought
Task Assigned To Timeline Due
Dates
CAS Work Form C:
Summary Action Plan
Step Four:
This form concludes the self-assessment process and calls for action
to be taken as a consequence of study results. Write a brief action
plan statement in the spaces below for each Part in which action is
required.
Part 1: Mission
Part 2: Program
Part 3: Leadership
Part 4: Human Resources
Part 5: Ethics
An iterative Cycle…
1. Purpose & scope of study is defined
2. Self-study team is created and trained
3. Evaluative evidence is collected
4. Determine how well Standards are met
5. Appropriate actions are recognized
6. Action plan is developed and approved
7. Plan is communicated and enacted
8. Repeat (i.e., step 1 = check if improvement achieved)
Participant Outcomes
 In order to be able to conduct a CAS self-review, by the end
of this session participants will be able to:
 Articulate the purpose and benefits of the review
 Feel increased self-efficacy
 Identify institutional stakeholders needed for review process
 Identify and obtain appropriate sources of data/evidence
 Use data to evaluate compliance with standards & guidelines
 Document and present the results of the review

similar documents