CIU 20 Correlation Data Presentation

Report
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
CIU 20
Principal Effectiveness Day 2
Correlation Data/Relationship
for Principals
Choose one of these dates:
September 26, 2014
September 29, 2014
October 28, 2014
Michelle Bozzini – Assistant Director of Curriculum and Auxiliary Services
Kathy Emeigh – Director of Curriculum
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
Agenda for Correlation
Data/Relationship
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Welcome and Introductions
Professional Reflection
The Legislative “Journey”
Performance Level Descriptor “Walk”
Facilitated Process “Walk-Through”
Simulations “Drive”
Considering the “Destination”
www.education.state.pa.us
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
How has the Framework for
Leadership helped you to be more
effective?
• How have you seen the
Framework for
Leadership being used
to increase
principal/leader
effectiveness?
• What processes have
you seen or heard about
that are being used to
effectively integrate the
Framework for
Leadership?
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Multiple Measures
Principal Effectiveness Ratings as Defined in Act 82
Form 82-2 available on CIU 20 Website
• For the overall principal effectiveness rating, we know that…
– 50% will comprise the observation/practice piece (Framework
for Leadership).
– 15% will be derived from building level data (School
Performance Profile – SPP).
– 15% will be determined by the relative strength of
conversation regarding the connectedness between average
teacher observation/practice ratings and teacher-level
measures.
– 20% will incorporate Elective Data / SLOs for principals.
(note: for 2014-15, elective data is optional)
4
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
www.education.state.pa.us
The Correlation “Journey…”
• HB 1901
• Act 82
– Look at the Language
– Look at Table H – Correlation Data Performance Level
Descriptors
• THE Pie
• The Rating Tool – PDE 82-2
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Principal Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012
Observation/ Practice
Framework for Leadership Domains
Strategic/Cultural Leadership
Systems Leadership
Leadership for Learning
Professional and Community Leadership
Building Level Data/School Performance Profile
Indicators of Academic Achievement
Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students
Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Historically
Underperforming Students
Academic Growth PVAAS
Other Academic Indicators
Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement
Building
Level Data,
15%
Observation
/Practice
50%
Correlation
Data Based on
Teacher-Level
Measures,
15%
Elective
Data
20%
Correlation Data/Relationship
Based on Teacher Level Measures
Elective Data/SLOs
District Designed Measures and Examinations
Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests
Industry Certification Examinations
Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements
Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
June 26, 2014
6
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Correlation Data
Based Upon Teacher Level Measures
• It was recommended that we adopt a process that focuses on the
conversation between the supervising administrator and the
principal / school leader based on the principal’s knowledge,
understanding and intended use of the evidence / data presented.
• The rating for correlation data is based on a qualitative assessment
by the supervising administrator of the level of understanding (0, 1,
2, or 3) of the quantitative analysis conducted by the principal /
school leader.
7
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Performance Level Descriptor
“Walk”
• Look at the “Performance Level Descriptor Chart” in
your packet.
• What are your “Noticings?”
• Familiarize yourself with the definitions of the
Performance Level Descriptors.
• How is this an integral part of the “Correlation
Conversation?
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Correlation Data
Based Upon Teacher Level Measures
• To aid the supervising administrator in assigning a correlation rating (0, 1,
2, or 3), a Performance Level Descriptor Chart has been developed.
• This chart will provide guidance for rating the conversation between the
supervising administrator and the principal / school leader regarding the
connectedness between Teacher Level Measures and Observation and
Practice (Framework for Teaching) ratings.
• Teacher Level Measures “shall include, but not be limited to any
combination of one or more of the following data”
• Building Level Data / SPP
• Teacher Specific Data (PVAAS, etc.)
• Elective Data / Teacher SLOs
9
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Correlation Data
Performance Level Descriptor Chart
• The conversation will be measured based upon the principal /school
leader’s understanding of these aspects:
– Degree of understanding of evidence presented regarding the
relationship between teacher-level measures and teacher
observation and practice ratings.
– Quality of explanation provided for observed relationships
between teacher-level measures and teacher observation and
practice ratings.
– Plans for how the data will be used to support school and LEA
goals.
10
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Correlation Data
Looking at “Connectedness”
• The conversation will be based upon the connectedness between
teacher level measures and observation/practice ratings.
• The following charts (displayed on subsequent slides) may be used
to determine the relative strength of the connectedness between the
teacher level measures and observation/practice (Framework for
Teaching) ratings.
• Note: The ranges within the charts are based upon the conversion tables
within PA 82-1 (Teacher Rating Tool).
11
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
Break
www.education.state.pa.us
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Facilitated Process Walk-Through
• To prepare for this job – watch this video!
• See Packet and walk through the process together.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
Simulations “Drive”
• Divide into your areas of interest:
1. Elementary
2. Middle School
3. High School
4. K – 12
• In your “teams” drive through the Guidance for
Completing the Correlation Section of the Rating
Tool document
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
WHY???
• Why do you think Correlation Data/Relationship is a
part of Principal Effectiveness?
• How does this affect the child in the classroom?
Measuring Principal Effectiveness
Tom Corbett, Governor
▪
Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education
www.education.state.pa.us
The mission of the Pennsylvania Department of Education is to lead
and serve the educational community, to enable each individual to grow
into an inspired, productive, fulfilled lifelong learner.
18

similar documents