The Periodic Review Report and the Assessment of Institutional Effectiveness Presentation by: Karen Froslid Jones and Robin Beads, American University (AU) http://www.american.edu/provost/oira http://www.american.edu/middlestates Our goal is to provide an instiututional perspective that helps you to: • Gain insight into Middle States expectations regarding institutional assessment; • Know what to develop/look for in the PRR to demonstrate that the institution meets these expectations; and • Nuts and bolts: Develop an effective report by offering specific tips for achieving success. Today’s Presentation Accountability Improvement Why Institutional Assessment? Institutional Assessment Response to Recommendations Challenges and opportunities Enrollment and finance trends/ projections Linking institutional planning and budgeting The PRR as Institutional Assessment Demonstrate that the institution has: • organized and sustained assessment processes • clearly articulated institutional and unit-level goals • Learning outcomes at course, program and institution level • Implimented strategies to achieve those goals • Assessed • Used the results of assessments to: • Improve programs, services, teaching, and learning • Inform planning • Inform resource allocation The PRR and Institutional Effectiveness (#5 of 6] Set Goals/Outcomes Assessment Plan Implement Use Assessment to Improve Perhaps 5 years ago…? Set Goals/Outcomes Assessment Plan Implement Use Assessment to Improve Today…. Structures Momentum Culture Outcomes Institutional Effectiveness Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness: What to Develop/Look For • When it is embedded effectively within larger institutional systems, assessment can help us focus our collective attention, examine our assumptions, and create a shared… culture dedicated to assuring and improving…quality… • Based on Thomas Angelo, 2005 • “An organizational environment in which decisions are based on facts, research, and analysis and where services are planned and delivered in ways that maximize positive outcomes and impacts for customers and stakeholders” • Ndoye and Parker (2010) quoting Lakos, Phipps and Wilson(2004) What is a culture of assessment? • Highlight the ways that assessment is valued. • What recognition or rewards have been put in place? • What evidence is there of faculty, leadership, and institutional “buy in” ? • Demonstrate that efforts have gone into making assessments do-able, useful • “Useful” and “Cost effective” • Show evidence that assessment results – both positive and negative – are welcomed. • “Reasonably accurate and truthful” • Demonstrate how assessment is used and imbedded into the fabric of the institution. Culture Demonstrate that the institution has: • Organized, sustained processes for assessment (including use of results). • Guidelines, policies, resources, coordination, and support of assessment. • Communication strategies. • The importance of a written or on-line assessment plan. Structures • Document progress in: • Development of learning outcomes; • Improvement/refinement of assessment strategies; • Implementation of assessment plans (depth and breadth); and • Use of results to improve student learning and advance the institution. • Can you describe and document how your assessments have improved? • Give sense of institution’s next steps. Momentum • Provide evidence that assessment is used and useful: • For planning; • For improvement; • Provide evidence that changes at the institution are based on evidence, facts. • Link assessments to institutional goals and objectives (including learning outcomes). Outcomes Structures Momentum Culture Outcomes Institutional Effectiveness Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness: What to Develop/Look For Emphasize Uses of Assessment Link to Planning Think Broadly Present Results Organize Make Effective Use of the Web The Nuts and Bolts: Tools to Help Organize for Success Response to Recommendations • Former Self-Study Committee Major Challenges and Opportunities • Strategic Planning Committee Enrollment and Finance Trends • Based on work of Budget Committee Organized and sustained institutional assessment • Learning Outcomes and Assessment Team Linked institutional planning and budgeting • Budget Committee 1. Organize the PRR Using Existing “Assessment” Venues • Look for institutional changes/improvements using annual reports, communications to community, and other sources. • Identify the successful assessments that advanced the changes. • Use “challenges” and negative situations to highlight your assessment processes and commitment to institutional improvement. • Use benchark data, as appropriate. 2.Think Broadly Survey academic & administrative units to inventory current assessment activities: • Inventory areas where learning outcomes have been – or should be - developed. • Inventory on-going and one time activities for documentation in PRR • Gather examples of how assessments have been used in planning and decisionmaking. • Document how assessments have been used to advance goals and improve programs/services. 2. Think Broadly (cont.) • Demonstrate how curriculum changed as a result of assessment. • Identify improvements or changes that have advanced the institution mission. • Highlight how recommendations in the SelfStudy have been implemented 3. Highlight Uses of Assessment American University Strategic Plan • Created an inclusive process for input endorsed by top administration and faculty; communicated through website and addresses to campus • Assessment data was made available to community during the planning process via the website. • Made sure that assessment of student learning was highlighted in strategic plan. • Identified mechanisms to assess the plan and track the recommended actions. • Linked unit level plans to strategic plans and highlighted assessment of learning outcomes • Linked Strategic Plan initiatives to budget 4. Emphasize the Link to Planning • Use of sidebars/text boxes to highlight examples of assessment activities, use of assessment, important points. • Inventory your institutional assessment tools and map them to Middle States standards in chart format • Emphasize exemplars of institutional/ student learning assessments • Quantify changes/improvements made as a result of assessment • Include links to data/assessment results embedded within the text (web or pdf) 5. Presenting Assessment Results (cont’d) • Highlight funding of strategic plan and other goals • Provide appendix with links to supplemental docs • Quote admin/faculty/students to help demonstrate your culture of assessment “Assessment, and the invaluable feedback it provides, informs us of areas in need of improvement thereby strengthening our curricula. To that end, the Office of the Provost will make every effort to support faculty as they assess courses and programs and implement strategies toward curricular enhancement.” - Dr. Scott A. Bass, Provost 5. Presenting Assessment Results • Create a website to include PRR guidelines, supporting documents, the final report. • Organize supporting documentation by chapter so that reviewers can find information quickly and easily. • Be selective, but thorough in what you decide to include as supporting documentation. • Determine public versus private web-based supporting documentation • • Password protect proprietary web-based documentation/data for your university community Work with appropriate units on your campus to obtain temporary log-ins and passwords for the PRR reviewers 6. Website Communications For more information: American University’s Middle States and PRR website http://www.american.edu/middlestates/index.cfm http://www.american.edu/provost/oira Karen Froslid Jones: [email protected] Robin Beads: [email protected] Wrap Up – Questions?