NMC revalidation and code review slides

Report
Revalidation and
Code review update
November 2014
Context
•
NMC is the largest professional healthcare
regulator in the world – 680,000 on register
•
we protect patients and the public by regulating
nurses and midwives
•
we set standards of education, conduct and
performance for nurses and midwives
•
currently three year renewal period (Prep)
o
450 hours of practice
o
35 hours continuing professional development
The Principles
•
Extensive engagement across 4 countries of UK
•
Developed in line with our current legislative framework
(450 hours of practice)
•
Phased approach (phase 1: Jan 2016 to Dec 2018)
•
Built on the existing processes:
•
o
3 year renewal cycle
o
appraisals
Regular auditing
Proposed revalidation model
•
Will replace the current three-yearly renewal and the NoP form.
•
Each nurse or midwife, at the point of renewal, will declare they
have met the revalidation requirements:
o
Practised at least 450 hours during the last three years
o
Undertaken at least 40 hours of CPD, with a minimum of 20 hours
being participatory learning
o
Declared their good health and good character
o
Reflected on at least five instances of practice-related feedback
o
Had an appropriate professional indemnity arrangement in place
o
Obtained confirmation from a third party
Consultation - part one
Online survey (January to March) on the revalidation model
and the Code:
•
Focused on operational aspects of the model, gathering
intelligence on how it will work across all settings;
•
Gauged initial views on the content of the revised Code
•
Outcomes informed drafting a revised Code and
revalidation model development
o
Promoted through NMC and stakeholder communication channels
o
Supported by extensive stakeholder engagement
Consultation - part one
Overview
•
9799 responses (6741 online + 3058 omnibus);
•
215 responses from organisations;
•
68% direct patient care, others in management,
education, policy and research roles;
•
Majority in permanent employment;
•
Representative responses from all 4 countries;
•
Omnibus – clear majority of UK public feel revalidation
would enhance public safety.
Consultation part one
• Majority prefer a NMC registered nurse/midwife who is
overseeing their work to confirm:
o Support also for an employer / manager who oversees their work(but
is not a registrant), peer or another UK regulated health professional
who has worked with them.
• Almost all respondents said they receive an appraisal with
a majority feeling it is the best way of obtaining
confirmation
• Strong support for feedback on practice from peers
(registered nurses/midwives), patients and service users
and other colleagues.
o Also support for relatives and carers
Consultation part two
•
Started 19 May and closed 11 August 2014;
•
Considered draft revised Code and revalidation;
•
Consisted of an online consultation survey and qualitative
research, including deliberative workshops, focus groups
and online forums with:
- nurses and midwives
- employers
- patients and the public
- seldom heard groups
•
•
1,652 responses from individuals (110 responses from
organisations / stakeholders)
Final report – mid October
Part 2 Consultation headline
themes: revalidation
•
Revalidation broadly welcomed as a way of improving the
regulation of nurses and midwives and enhancing patient
care.
•
Most felt they could access appropriate confirmer and
appraisal.
•
Majority agreed with requirement of 40 hours CPD (20
hours participatory over 3 years) – feeling that CPD could
have a positive impact on their patient care
•
Most already reflect on feedback – some keep a formal
account others do so informally
Consultation outcomes: The
Code
Encouraging, the draft revised Code has generated
considerable comment, much of it positive. Going forward key
issues include:
•
Application: ensuring it addresses all scopes of practice,
not just direct patient care roles.
•
Tone: including positive language to support the
professionalism agenda.
•
Length/relevance: reducing the length and enabling
registrants to use the Code to revalidate against their own
practice so they don’t attempt to apply aspects which don’t
relate to their scope of practice.
Engagement overview
•
Over NMC 100 engagement activities between January –
September 2014;
•
Directly engaged approx. 2750 stakeholders
•
Included 5 Stakeholder Summits: March – July 2014
Attended by over 1200 stakeholders
- Mostly managers/leaders of nurses and midwives.
-
•
Transition from consultation promotion to strategic partnership
building
supporting employer readiness
- planning the pilots
- preparing the pilot organisations
-
revalidation pilots
Commences: early 2015
Purpose: test the process, tools and model
Outcomes: will inform refining the model, guidance,
supporting information and NMC/employer systems and
processes
Coverage: settings to reflect the diversity of the register:
• GSTT / Mersey Care
Tranche 2
Tranche 1
Independent,
• NHS Tayside
social care, selfNovember
15 October • Aneurin Bevan UHB
employed, niche
• Western HSC Trust
• PHE
Timeline
December 2015: Council considers draft revised Code
End of December 2014: publication of revised Code
January 2015: publication of draft guidance for revalidation
January to June 2015: revalidation – pilot and testing
Autumn 2015: Council decision on model and roll out
End of 2015: revalidation launch
Thank you
Questions and
Feedback

similar documents