What do you know about the 2014-2015 Educator Evaluator System?

Report
EVALUATIONS,
STUDENT
GROWTH
MEASURES &
KEEP
AUG 25, 2014
BILL BAGSHAW,
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
WHAT DO YOU KNOW?
What do you know about the 2014-2015
Educator Evaluator System?
WHAT QUESTIONS DO YOU HAVE?
What questions do you have about the
2015-2015 Educator Evaluation System?
FEDERAL WAIVER – PRINCIPLE 3
SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE
INSTRUCTION AND LEADERSHIP
Implement teacher and principal evaluation
and support systems that:
1. Are used for continual improvement of
instruction
2. Use at least 3 performance levels
3. Use multiple measures including student
growth as significant factor
4. Are used to evaluate on a regular basis
5. Provide clear, timely, and useful feedback
6. Are used to inform personnel decisions
EVALUATION UPDATE
AUGUST 2014
•
All 286 D2 Assurance online forms have
been submitted.
•
All evaluations systems to be used in
Kansas for 2014-2015 have been posted
to the Evaluations webpages.
•
Student Growth Measures Online Forms
are on Evaluations website. Principals
can use throughout the year to update
as needed.
PREVIOUS YEARS
Chosen Instructional
Practice Protocol
SUMMARY RATING
2014-2015
Chosen Instructional
Practice Protocol
IPP SUMMARY
RATING
FINAL
Summative
Evaluation
Rating
Three Student Growth
Measures
SGMs SUMMARY
RATING
EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM
Student
Learning
Content
Knowledge
Instructional
Practice Protocol
Summary Rating
Instructional
Practice
Professional
Responsibility
Student
Growth
Measure
Student
Growth
Measure
Student
Growth
Measure
FINAL
SUMMATIVE
Rating
Student Growth
Measures
Summary Rating
STUDENT
GROWTH
MEASURES
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
• Kansas requires:
• Include student growth as significant factor in evaluation of
classroom teachers and building leaders
• Multiple measures (>1) required (therefore, 2 or 3 selected
for each grade level or content area)
• State assessments are required to be 1 of the KEEP
SGMs for all grade levels and content areas that give them
• Multiple SGMs (>1) must be met by teacher or building
leader to allow effective or highly effective rating
MULTIPLE STUDENT GROWTH
MEASURES
3
2
2
2
1
0
Ineffective
Insignificant
3
1
Developing
Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Significant
“Multiple Measures” is an educational term used to look at various measures of student growth, in
addition to the state assessments.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
What are any/all student growth measures
currently being used in your grade level or
subject area?
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
•
Select Growth Measures from current measures:
•
•
•
SGM documents growth attributable to the teacher or building
leader between two or more identified points in time
Commercially purchased assessments acceptable as SGM
Locally developed assessments acceptable as SGM:
•
•
•
Designed, reviewed and used across the district with strict
adherence to an inter-rater agreement
Created in consultation with school administration with
expertise in assessment, special education, ELL specialists
and content experts.
All grade levels across schools in a single district are advised
to use the same measures
•
Student Growth Objectives (SGOs) or Student Learning
Objectives (SLOs) are developed by collaborative districtwide team
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
• Select Growth Measures from current measures:
• All grade levels across schools in a single district are
advised to use the same measures
•
Student Growth Objectives (SGOs) or Student Learning
Objectives (SLOs) are developed by collaborative districtwide team
• Covers all key subject/grade level content standards
• Number of test items should correlate to distribution of time
spent teaching the content
• Require higher order thinking as appropriate
• Should allow high and low achieving students to
demonstrate knowledge
• Valid and reliable
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
• Online form on KSDE Evaluation Website – submit/update
SGMs for elementary, middle and high schools
• List of possible SGMs on KSDE Evaluation website
• Not endorsed or suggested, simply a repository of all being
used by districts as submitted to KSDE
MET / NOT MET
• Decisions on met / not met set scores or minimum levels
is made at the District Level.
THINKING ABOUT SGMS
• SGMs are things students do.
• Has the educator being evaluated had a chance to make
an impact on the SGM?
•
•
Building Leaders, Counselors, etc.. – make sure the
educator being evaluated has been a part of the process
in impacting SGMs being used (for example graduation
rates, etc.)
Secondary teachers – Helpful to use same SGMs for all in
same subject area, but only use SGMs that teacher had a
chance to impact. For example, teacher of senior level
English wouldn’t use State Assessments that were
completed before the teacher ever worked with the
students.
NOTING SGMS IN KEEP WEB
APP
• SGMs tab in KEEP cannot be filled out until all data is
ready to be completed.
• Evaluators – note the SGMs in the Beginning of Cycle
Conference Discussion Summary.
• Gives everyone a “heads up” about what’s coming later in
the Formal Evaluation Cycle process.
TEACHERS NOT IN FORMAL
EVALUATION CYCLE
• Gather data.
• Set aside artifacts and SGMs results in personal folders
and desktops.
• Allows teachers to demonstrate quality of teaching
beyond Aug – Feb 15th of Formal Evaluation Cycle year!
• This process not fully complete/information until 20172018 when multiple years of data has been accumulated.
DETERMINING
RATINGS
THE MATRIX
Matrix Activity
THE MATRIX
RULES
• Must meet all three SGMs to be considered highly
effective or its equivalent for the SGM Rating.
• Must meet at least two student growth measures to be
considered effective or its equivalent for SGM Summary
rating.
• Must meet at least one SGMs to be considered developing
or its equivalent for the SGM Summary Rating.
• The Final Summative Rating can only be rated one
performance level higher than the lowest rating.
• When both Summary Ratings are the same, it becomes the
Final Summative Performance Rating.
REVISIT YOUR QUESTIONS
What answers do you have?
What questions didn’t get answered?
What new questions do you have?
CONTACT
Bill Bagshaw
Assistant Director
[email protected] 785-296-2198
Kelly Dempewolf
Program Consultant – Educator Evaluation
[email protected]
785-296-5140

similar documents