Red Brome

Red Brome
Anita Thompson
NRES 441
Invasive Plants
Scientific and common names
Family – Poaceae (Grasses)
Names can be confusing and/or location dependent!
• Foxtail chess – Bromus madritensis L.
• Red brome – Bromus rubens L.
Or by subspecies
• Foxtail chess – Bromus madritensis ssp. madritensis
• Red brome is a subspecies of foxtail chess – Bromus madritensis ssp.
rubens (L.)
Or by location
• Foxtail chess (for the species as a whole) – Bromus madritensis
• Red brome (for most of the United States) – Bromus madritensis ssp.
•Red Brome (for California/where some foxtail chess and red brome
populations overlap) – Bromus rubens
Scientific and common names
• Anisantha madritensis (British Isles)
Common names:
• Foxtail chess
• Compact brome
• Spanish brome
• Red Brome
Invasive classification:
Not listed federally at this time
Not listed in Nevada at this time
Listed in California
• CA Invasive Plant Inventory
• CA Exotic Pest Plant Council
 Foxtail chess on the A-1 list: most invasive wildland
plants; widespread.
Plant Description
• Cool season, annual grass
• Culms (stems) are several to numerous - 4 to 28 inches tall
• Spike-like Panicle inflorescence, 1 to 4 inches tall with long awns (1/2 to 1
inch long). Seedhead is reddish-purple when mature.
• Blades are short, narrow and flat with prominent veins. Ligule: 1/8 in. long
• In comparison to foxtail chess which has hairier stems and leaf
sheaths, more lax panicles and wider lemmas.
Foxtail chess
Red brome
Site Characteristics
• Blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima) communities.
• Creosote/blackbrush transition zones
• Creosote/saltbrush/blackbrush communites
In Utah and Arizona:
• Sagebrush communties
• Desert scrub
• understory of mature mesquite bosques
Foxtail chess is an invader of the historical perennial
grasslands of California.
Prefers disturbed sites
Prefers Mediterranean sites (dry summers, wet winters) but
can occur in drier climates.
Site characteristics cont.
• CA: up to 7200’
• NV: 1200 to 5000’
• UT: 2500 to 5500’
• AZ: Sea level to 4100’
• site dependent
• 2” to 10”
• In the Mojave, preferred 2-4” annual precipitation
• Shallow, coarse textured
• Little competition from other annuals
• Likes shrub canopies
• Some areas – clay and sandy loams
• Can be found in areas with high levels of sulfur dioxide
pollution. (Acid rain/sulfur emissions)
Geographic Range
• Red brome – Native throughout southern Europe
• Foxtail chess – Native throughout Europe and British Isles
Currently found in:
• WA south to CA, east to ID, TX and Sonora (Mexico)
• Casually adventive (not native and not fully established) in
the Northeast (NY, MA, MY, VA, SC) and introduced in HI
Three main ideas:
• California Gold Rush/Central Valley Wheat
• Southern California shipping
• Northern California sheep
Accidental Introduction from Mediterranean
• Occasional intentional plantings (grazing/cultivation?)
Introduced prior to the1880’s
• Earliest herbarium record – 1879 in Plumas County, CA.
Red brome is an annual winter grass
• Germination is a direct response to fall rains
• Slow growth until spring rains
• Rapid increase in vegetation growth after spring rains
• Flowering/fruiting occur in April and May
• Seed dispersal in summer
Prolific seed producer – averages 76 seeds/plant
Prefers disturbed areas
Requires less moisture than natives
Rarely grazed (little nutritional value, ripe seedheads/awns
dangerous to livestock)
Very responsive to over-grazed and post-fire areas
Problem #1 – Grazing disturbance
Overgrazing/range overuse issue
Opens up spaces (gaps) between other native grasses
and shrubs for successful germination
• Red brome is shade intolerant
• “Hoof action” stirs up soils
• Seed can be from on or off site sources
Carried from one site to another by hoof, fur, etc
• Red brome germination traits enable it to germinate and
grow faster than annuals.
• Not just a domestic grazer issue
• Plant is not a preferred browse
Sheep will graze in winter
Problem #2 - Fire
Number 1 management issue!
• Shortens fire return intervals by increasing potential
starts and rate of spread.
• Promotes fire where fire was previously infrequent (ex.
Desert environments)
• Produces a large amount of fine fuels that may lead to fast
and hot fires (light and “flashy fuels”).
• May be more of an issue than cheatgrass
 Natural ranges usually have lower humidity – leads to
slower biomass breakdown.
 This leads to fuels persisting for longer periods
Why is Red Brome a Fire Management Issue?
Red brome grows in
areas that were once
either open gaps (vacant
niches) or filled with
native annuals that were
out competed.
Red brome
interspersed with
native plants
Fire return interval is now
shortened = more frequent
Native shrubs are
killed = loss of
habitat, food value
etic values
Red brome now has more
spaces to germinate
Other fire management considerations:
• Occurs mainly in non-fire adapted ecosystems
• Low intensity winter fires are not high enough to kill
seeds (but can kill vegetation).
• Can initially be an off site colonizer and then move
to the disturbed sites
• Does not have a large (if any) seed bank
•Fires can affect endangered wildlife
 Ex. Federally threatened desert
tortoise (Gopherus agassizii)
 Mojave desert dweller
 Fires have reduced food sources
(native grasses, cacti) and habitat
(shrubs required for shading and
protection from predators
Ecological and Societal Impacts
• Threatened and Endangered Species (i.e. Tortoise)
• Loss of habitat and food sources for non T&E species
• Increased frequency of fires
• Potential soil/nutrient losses
• Succession issues (succession can stay in early seral stages)
Societal Impacts:
• Lowered recreational/aesthetic value
• More fires = more suppression efforts = more $
• Wildland – Urban Interface issues (loss of homes, etc)
• Loss of functional grazing lands = higher cost to livestock
producers = higher cost to consumers
• High costs for containing/managing R. brome
Management Strategies
The Nature Conservancy Stewardship Abstract recommends:
• Management:
Reducing seed heads
 Re-seeding with native annuals
• Mechanical control:
 Removal of seedlings by hoeing or hand removal
 Time consuming but reduces future seeds
 Mulching with 5 to 13 cm of mulch or a layer of black plastic. (Site
• Burning and Grazing:
 Late-fall burns can damage R. Brome seed heads and
encourage perennial grasses.
 Some grazing by sheep in winter can increase native bunchgrass
Management Strategies cont.
 Most effective control would be pre-emergent herbicides (kill
seeds before germination)
 But would also kill native annual seeds
 Recommends atrazine – 11.2 kg atrazine per hectare
 Disadvantage: toxic effects lasted in surrounding vegetation
for 8 years
•Continued monitoring and research
Case study: Anaho Island
•Original survey (thesis) in 1966 by
W.V. Woodbury.
•Research published in 1991 (see
works cited) by T. Svejcar and R.
•Surveyed for USFWS in 2009 by S.
Kulpa, et al. (unpublished data)
• Largest island in Pyramid Lake, NV
• 750 acres in size
• highest point is 540 ft above lake level
(over 4300 ft above sea level)
• National Wildlife Refuge
• No record of intentional grazing or burning
• Inhabited by nesting birds (and
• Possible remains of sheep and goats (1966)
Anaho Island cont.
1966, B. rubens was common (2150%) only in the upper terraces,
but occurred occasionally (6-20%)
the shoreline and lower terraces
of the NE side
Kulpa, S. Unpublished data
2009, B. rubens was very
common (50%+) to common on
most of the island. It was not
surveyed on the lower NE
terraces due to pelican nests.
Anaho Island cont.
What they learned/observed:
• The lower elevations were more dominated by perennial natives
• The higher elevations had higher exotic annuals
•Possibly due to higher thatch levels from lack of herbivores.
Unknown as to why or how Red brome is the dominant annual on the
• Different plant genotypes?
• Nesting birds providing nutrient inputs?
• Lack of herbivory?
• Is the island environment a factor (isolation)?
Other interesting facts:
S. Kulpa
• Red brome outcompeted cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in many places.
• Fire establishment on the island would be catastrophic
• Island is over run with rattlesnakes. How did they get there? Did they kill
off the herbivores who feed on the grass seeds?
Works cited
Bowers, Michael A. 1987. Precipitation and the relative abundances of desert winter annuals: a 6-year
study in the northern Mohave Desert. Journal of Arid Environments. 12: 141-149. [4850]
Kulpa, S., 2009. Anaho Island Research (unpublished data).
Reid, C.R., S. Goodrich and J.E. Bowns. 2008. Cheatgrass and Red Brome: History and Biology of Two
Invaders. Proceedings - Shrublands under fire: disturbance and recovery in a changing
world. Proc. RMRS-P-52. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Research Station.
Salo, L.F. 2004. Population dynamics of red brome (Bromus madritensis subsp. Rubens): times for
concern, opportunities for management. Journal of Arid Environments 57: 291-296.
Salo, L.F. 2005. Red brome (Bromus rubens subsp. Madritensis) in North America: possible modes for
early introductions, subsequent spread. Biological Invasions 7: 165-180.
Simonin, Kevin A. 2001. Bromus rubens, Bromus madritensis. In: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: [ 2010, April 30].
Svejcar, T. and R. Tausch. 1991. Anaho Island, Nevada: A Relict Area Dominated By Annual Invader
Species. Rangelands 13(5): 233-236.
The Nature Conservancy. 2001. Element Stewardship Abstract For Bromus rubens., [2010, April
Utah State University Extension. 2002. Red Brome., [2010, April 30].

similar documents