Slide 1

Report
Engineering Update
December 7
Prepared By
The Water CIP Team
`
December 7, 2011
Agenda
 Letterman BS
 Project Background


Project Location
Final Design
 Scope of Work
 Site Layout
 Relocation Agreement
 Request for Proposal
 Consultant Selection Process
 Final Recommendation
 Project Timing
 Q/A
December 7, 2011
Existing Nason and Dracaea BPS
Future R/W
Projection
Proposed Letterman BPS
24” Offsite Transmission
Pipelines (Included)
December 7, 2011
Proposed Booster Station
 Replacement for Nason and Dracaea Booster
 Site Encroached upon by Nason Street Improvements
 Existing Station beyond useful life
 Preliminary Design Report Completed by PBS&J – 2009
 Final Design – Scope of Work
 Booster Station and 2,500 lf of Transmission Pipeline






Project Management
Preliminary Design Refinement
Investigations
 Survey, Geotechnical, Acoustical, Corrosion,
Preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications
Operational Control Strategy
Bidding Assistance
December 7, 2011
December 7, 2011
Relocation Agreement
 City of Moreno Valley
 Key Components:
 Reimbursement

up to $2,000,000
 Development Impact Fees
 Priority will not change
Nason and Dracaea Booster
 Pump Station Property exchange
 Continuance until fully reimbursed
 Option for City to reimburse with
real estate
December 7, 2011
Request for Proposal
 RFP for Final Design
 August 10, 2011
 Seven (7) consulting firms







HDR
URS
IEC
Brown and Caldwell
Krieger and Stewart
Kennedy Jenks
 declined to propose
Atkins (PBS&J)
December 7, 2011
Selection Process
 Selection Committee
 Joe Mouawad, Greg Kowalski, Brian Raines
 Khos Ghaderi, Mark Iverson, Jim Wyatt
 Selection Criteria
 Past Performance and qualifications of the proposed team members
 Familiarity with project and capacity to handle all aspects of the work.
 Ability to commence work immediately and complete within time frame.
 Proposed project approach, scope, manner, thoroughness, and overall
proposal presentation.
 Firm's experience, staff availability, stability, financial responsibility, and
past performance on similar projects.
December 7, 2011
Request for Proposal
 Top Ranked firms
 Brown and Caldwell
 HDR
 Interviews
 Held on October 28, 2011
 Both Firms Equal
 Opened Fee Proposals

.
Tasks 1-7, no Tasks 1-7,
options
all options
B&C:
$438,055
$605,199
HDR:
$513,112
$715,300
 Difference ~20%
December 7, 2011
Recommendation
 Committee Recommends
 B&C
 Negotiated fee of $429,969

Includes Value Engineering Coordination
 Sub consultants
 Sladden Engineering of Hemet, CA – Geotechnical
 Cozad & Fox of Hemet, CA – Surveying
 RF Yeager Engineering of Lakeside, CA – Corrosion
 Simon Wong Engineering of San Diego, CA – Structural
 RHA Landscape Architecture of Riverside, CA – Landscaping
December 7, 2011
Project Timing
 Preliminary Design Report
 Relocation Agreement
 Request for Proposal
 Award Final Design
 Project Bid for Construction
 Construction Completion
 Project Closeout
– 02/20/2009
– 08/02/2011
– 08/10/2011
– 12/07/2011
– 12/2012
– 02/2014
– 03/2014
December 7, 2011
Questions?
December 7, 2011

similar documents