Title – Times New Roman 28pt, Line spacing 28pt Title 2

Report
PSI Pricing Study
Presentation M. de Vres
LAPSI meeting – Muenster
27 January 2011
1
© 2010 Deloitte
Study in a nuthshell
1.
2.
3.
4.
Assigned by the European Commission DG INFSO
Consortium of Deloitte & Touche Belgium, Tech4i2, Marc
6 months (January – June 2011)
Aims:
a. what are the effects of different pricing models for PSI
b. Snapshot of the Apps market, based on PSI
c. What is the impact of portal initiatives like data.gov
5. 19 case studies, 10 good guys (group A = marginal or for
free, 9 bad guys (group B = cost price or cost price+)
6. Deliverable: report
7. Larger context: is article 6 PSI Directive to be amended?
2
© 2010 Deloitte
The big picture: which PSB charging model for PSI works best?
PSB
Pricing
(A+B+C)
Availability
(E)
Up stream impact  PSB data
(a) availability of PSI
(b) quality of PSI
(c) # ftes employed
(d) # new products, like Apps (D)
(e) Costs and returns
(f)  PSB impact assessment
3
Re-user
End-user
Down stream impact  market
data
(a) # re-users
(b) # ftes employed
(c) # new products, like Apps (D)
(d) # sales (money and quantity)
(e)  market impact assessment +
welfare effects
© 2010 Deloitte
Who is the boss? – what are the drivers in sectoral value chains
4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
What is the market structure?
Are there entry barriers?
Buying power re-users
Is it a need to have or nice to have product?
What is the spending power of the (re-) users?
What is the buying frequency
What are the consumer roles
(who pays, who uses, who influences?)
Impact
availability of substitutes assesspresence of competitors
ment
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
6.
6.
7.
7.
8.
policy making
execution
Production
PSIdiscretion
in the coreorofsimply
the public
task or more in the outskirt?
spending
or earning department
Are
there substitutes
for the PSI?
financial
Are
there freedom
private sector bodies producing the same raw data?
in the
or in the dark, public scrutiny
Are
thelime
datalight
volatile?
or dependent on other PSBs
Isautonomous
the quality key?
Market
legal itbasis:
statutory
basis?
Contractual basis?
Does
concern
high risk
data?
characteristics
otherconsumption
organisations,
including users
IsInfluence
there a final
date?
Proportion and importance of PSI in re-users products
© 2010 Deloitte
Selecting the right case studies – points for consideration
1.
2.
3.
4.
Every case selected needs to be spot on
Cross border sectoral comparison is key
Rubbish in is rubbish out: availability of data is key (group B)
The call:
a. French organisations
b. three sectors: meteorological, geographic information and business
information
c. 3 countries (for the 9 case studies under objective B)
Support by European Commission:
• Letter of recommendation
• Any contacts?
See a list of potential case
studies in the next section
5
© 2010 Deloitte
Possible case studies: C urrent long list – INPUT?
Objective A
Meteorological PSI
Geographical PSI
•
•
•
ES: AEMET
NL: Dutch Meteorological Service
NO: Norwegian Meteorological Service
•
•
•
•
•
FR: Météo France
DE: Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
UK: Met Office
PL: Polish meteorological service
SE: Swedish meteorological service
•
•
•
•
•
UK: Ordnance Survey
ES: Spanish cadastre
AT: Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen (BEV)
DK: Danish cadastre
DK: Erhvervs- og Byggestyrelsen (EBST) – Address data
•
•
•
•
FR: Institut géographique national (IGN) & French cadastre
DE: Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie & local
agencies
UK: HM Land Registry
UK: NLPG - IDeA – Address data
•
•
•
ES: IGN-CENIG
NL: Dutch cadastre
IT: Italian cadastre (Agenzia del Territorio)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FR: SIRENE business register provided by INSEE
DE: Handelsregister and Unternehmensregister by Federal
and State Ministries of Justice
UK: Companies House
NL: Dutch Chamber of Commerce
AT: Austrian business registers
IT: Italian business registers (Infocamere)
PL: Polish business registers
•
•
DE: Juris GmbH – Legal
IT: Ministry of Justice – Case law
Business
register PSI
Other PSI
sectors
6
Objective B
•
•
•
•
FR: Légifrance – Legal
DE: Statistisches Bundesamt – Statistics
ES: Centre of Juridical documentation (CENDOJ) – Legal
NL: RDW – Car registry
© 2010 Deloitte

similar documents