Experience with a new 4 loop haptics apodized

Report
Experience with a new 4 loop
haptics apodized diffractive
hydrophilic multifocal IOL
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD1,2
Ivanka van der Meulen MD1,2
Jan Willem van der Linden Boptom. 2
1. AMC, University of Amsterdam
2. Retina Total Eye Care, Driebergen
Financial Disclosure: Dr. Lapid is a speaker for Alcon, Hanita Lenses,
MSD, Oculentis, and a clinical investigator for Alcon. Mr. Van der Linden
and Dr. van der Meulen have no interest to disclose.
Purpose
• To report the outcomes in terms of visual acuity,
refraction, incidence of halos at 3 months after
implantation with a new 4 loop haptic apodized
diffractive hydrophilic multifocal IOL (MFIOL), the
BunnyLens (Hanitalenses, Israel)
Methods:
•Prospective interventional case cohort
•Standard phacoemulsification 2.2 mm incision, either
for cataract or refractive lens exchange.
•Outcome measures: uncorrected and corrected
distance acuity, uncorrected near acuity, incidence of
halos, historical comparison with cohorts of apodized
diffractive hydrophilic lenses, (SeeLens MF,
Hanitalenses, Israel) apodized diffractive hydrophobic
lens (SN6AD1, ReSTOR, Alcon), and a radially
asymmetric refractive IOL (LS-312 , Mplus lens,
Oculentis, Germany)
Results at 3 months
postoperatively:
LogMAR + SD
UCDA
0.02 + 0.14
CDVA
-0.06 + 0.01
UNA @40 cm
0.10 + 0.15
UNA @60 cm
0.29 + 0.18
Incidence of dysphotopsias
Range of postoperative
refraction
Other parameter:
3 of 19 patients 15.8%
0.20 D + 0.5
-0.75D to +1.5 D
Mean postop spherical
equivalent refraction
+0.16 D + 0.18 D
Complications
None
Historical Comparison
BunnyLens MF
SeeLens MF
ReSTOR
SN6AD1
Mplus
LS-312 MF30
Eyes
38
48
143
90
Post-op SE
0.20 D + 0.50
-0.03 D + 0.38
0.12 + 0.37
0.08 + 0.31
Range SE
+1.5 to -0.75
+0.875 to -0.675
+1.0 to -1.0
+1.0 to -0.75
UDVA
0.02 + 0.14 (1.0-)
-0.02 + 0.02 (1.0+)
0.04 + 0.09 (1.0-2)
0.04 + 0.15 (1.0-2)
CDVA
-0.06 + 0.01(1.0+3)
-0.05 + 0.08 (1.0+2)
-0.04 + 0.05 (1.0+2)
-0.02 + 0.03 (1.0+1)
[email protected]
0.10 + 0.15 (0.8)
(J=2)
0.06 + 0.09
(J=2++)
0.08 + 0.09 (0.8+)
(J=2+)
0.16 + 0.21 (0.63++)
(J=3++)
Halos
15.4%
12%
18.1%
18.9%
Material
Hydrophilic
Hydrophilic
Hydrophobic
Hydrophilic
Principle
Apodized Diffractive
Apodized Diffractive
Apodized Diffractive
Refractive
Asymmetric
(0.8++)
1) van der Linden et al, JCRS January 2012
2) van der Linden et al, International Ophthalmology, January 2013
Conclusion:
1. The BunnyLens MF (Hanita Lenses, Israel)
performs well in a small prospective cohort.
2. The IOL performs on par with historical data of
other lenses, like the SeeLens MF (Hanita
Lenses), the SN6AD1 (Restor, Alcon, USA),
and the LS-312 (Mplus, Oculentis, Germany
3. The hydrophilic apodized diffractive type of
IOL seems to induce less dysphotopsias, but
more study is needed to confirm this.

similar documents