New Mexico Banner Consortium

Report
June 5, 2014
Agenda
• Welcome Introductions
• NMTIE Event Recap
• Discussion on Consortium Group Structure
o Leadership Group
o Technical Architecture
o Training
o Contracts & RFP
o Security
• NM Banner XE Roadmap/Timeline
2
Welcome Introductions
• NMSU
o
o
o
o
Pamela Jeffries, Sr. Director, Enterprise Application Services
Pankaj Sharma, ICT Project Management Office
Alejandro Garcia, ICT Project Management Office
Grace La Torra, ICT Project Management Office
• CNM
o Joe Gieri, Office of IT Services Executive Director
o Ray Avila, Enterprise Application Director
• UNM
o Duane Arruti, IT Applications Director
o Paige Briggs, IT Applications Manager
3
NMTIE Event Recap
Inaugural Banner Track effort at NMTIE
• Best Practices for Implementing Banner XE (Alan Hansen, VP
of Product Enhancement at Ellucian)
• Lessons Learned from a Beta Partner (TTU)
• Planning and Preparation (NMSU, UNM)
• Chartering a NM Banner Consortium (Round Table)
• Existing Collaborative Groups
• Benefits/Concerns of a Consortium
• Proposed Structures/Subcommittees
4
Existing Collaborative
Groups
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CHECS
NM Independent Community College
NM Financial Aid group
Registrars NM Registrars Group
NM IT Exchange (smaller version of Banner Consortium)
NM Oracle Users Group
Security Group
5
Benefits/Concerns of a
Consortium
Benefits:
• Training
• Standardization
• Cost Benefits
• Sharing
• Idea & Collaboration
• Best practices
• No duplications of effort
• Common reporting - HED
• Simplify state data
• 3rd Party Integration &
inventory/version/contact/
issues
• Leverage buying power
Concerns:
•
More meetings
•
Consensus
•
Fizzle with no bang
•
Different priorities and timelines
•
All our eggs in one basket
•
Need more users in the consortium
to balance technical
•
Funding considerations
•
Legislators
•
Focus
6
Brainstorming on
Subcommittees
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Leadership Committee to cover structure and communication
Technical Architecture Group
Module specific with Tech and Users
Training Group
Contracts/RFP Group reviewing agreements
CHECS? (What are they currently doing)
Reporting/Data Management
Ellucian Code Repository
Community/Outreach
Security
Compliance
Leveraging shared infrastructure/Service Center Model
Common Infrastructure Group
Common App Development Group
DBA
7
Discussion on Consortium
Group Structure
o
The purpose of each group is
To be a forum for exchange of ideas,
o To identify common problems, and
o To collaborate on scalable common solutions
o
8
Discussion on Consortium
Group Structure
o
Leadership
o
o
Technical Architecture
o
o
Provide strategic guidance to the consortium
Identify opportunities for standardizing technical
architecture across the state and propose
recommended scalable technical architecture(s)
Training
o
Identify common training needs and propose a
recommended training curriculum for
consortium members
9
Discussion on Consortium
Group Structure
o
Contracts & RFP
o
o
Identify opportunities for collective
bargaining with vendors
Security
o
Identify common security needs and
recommend a scalable security framework
10
Discussion on Consortium
Group Structure
o
Discussion points
o
Process for constituting the groups
o Open enrollment or through nomination by
respective institutions?
o How do we appropriately balance
representation?
o
Chartering the groups
o
What is the charge of each group?
11
NM Banner XE
Roadmap/Timeline
12
13
14
15
Closing and Next Steps
16

similar documents